queenriley: (Default)
[personal profile] queenriley
Lost tonight was...

I didn't like the episode. It was predictable. I cringed and kept going "Charlie, no, don't honey" from the very begining because I could see (most of) what was coming. When did that happen? When did the writers suddenly make everything easily predictable?

Locke pissed me off. WTF, mate? Where does he get off being all it's fate, mystical, seeing people, obsessed with the hatch, Boone has to die cause the island demands it, and then he refuses to believe Charlie's visions are actually visions. Charlie even tried to talk to Locke about it, but before even seeing the damn statues, Locke assumes he's using.

Locke was uber-creepy and I want Claire to run far far away from him. Locke is, I believe, the one putting Aaron in danger. Locke wants something, and it doesn't bode well for Aaron.

Claire, totally understood why she did what she did. I would have done the same.

Poor Charlie. I hate where they're going with this, I really do.


Also, a non-episody nitpick... they've been on the island what, 2 months? 3 months now? Not long anyway. After all, each episode is supposed to be about 1-2 days and though we wait a week, the episodes pick up from right where they left off, if not a little overlap.

Aaron was born what... a month into their time on the island? So that would make him, at most, 8 weeks old. I'd be willing to bet it's more like 6 weeks old unless I somehow managed to miss 3 or so months going by on the island without them telling us...

That is DEFINATELY NOT an 8 week old baby! That baby looks older than Sam, and he's 4 months now. For crying out loud people, could you at least get an actor baby at least remotely close to the estimated age of the character? Yeesh... baby misrepresentation pisses me off. Grrr.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-26 01:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heatherhobbit.livejournal.com
I didn't like this episode either. If anyone was going to believe Charlie's visions, it would have been Locke.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-26 03:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrs-bombadil.livejournal.com
I wouldn't be surprised if the logistics of filming on location in Hawaii make it harder for them to keep getting new babies, let along ones the right age.

Not fond of the ep myself. Grr

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-26 08:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] forloveofrhea.livejournal.com
also that baby's tongue was never in his mouth.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-26 10:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atm-greggo.livejournal.com
tine, you're going to HATE this:

so, you said that the OLDEST the baby could be is 8wks and you'd be willing to settle for 6wks... well, if you follow the LOST timeline, Aaron wasn't born until the 42nd day and yesterday's episode ended on the 56th day. so...

the baby is only 14 DAYS OLD!OMFG!

you heard me right: the baby turned two weeks old yesterday! one fortnight, a single paycheck, the ides of march minus one, you get the idea. it's funny because a lot of hardcore fans in other communities constantly talk about the "monster baby" - so rest assured that you are NOT the only one who has a problem with the gargantuan, much-too-old actor-baby that is playing Aaron.

much love,
♥ greggo

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-27 12:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] queenriley.livejournal.com
*gasp* You're right!!!

<-- is very bad with math and has no memory... baby kills memory, it's true.

That's just freaky bad in an OMGLIEKWOAH way. 14 days old? Do I need to do a picture comparison for these people???? Geez, at 14 days old, a freakin DOLL would be more realistic.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-01-27 06:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atm-greggo.livejournal.com
i concur.

the monster baby will destroy all!

Profile

queenriley: (Default)
queenriley

January 2025

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags